The raid can be implemented either using a special controller hardware raid, or by an operating system driver software raid. It is fakeraid, but a class above the other fakes and much faster than any built in parity raid in windows. Generally speaking, software, fake, and hardware raid all support your normal raid tasks, such as keeping a raid in sync, rebuilding after a drive fails, checking drive health, etc. The different options for combining the disks are referred to as raid levels. It combines multiple inexpensive, small disk drives into an array of disks in order to provide redundancy, lower latency maximizing the chanc. If a hardware raid controller is not capable of nesting linear jbod with raid n, then. Feb 28, 2018 raid redundant array of independent disks is one of the popular data storage virtualization technology. External enclosure raid vs software raid spiceworks. Whether software raid vs hardware raid is the one for you depends on what you need to do and how much you want to pay.
Jun, 2016 comparing hardware raid vs software raid setups deals with how the storage drives in a raid array connect to the motherboard in a server or pc, and the management of those drives. So with those assumptions in place, you would only use hardware raid where needed because they arent cheap, and should always have a backup card in storage. Software raid handles raid commands at the kernel level. When storage drives are connected directly to the motherboard without a raid controller, raid configuration is managed by utility software in the operating system, and thus referred to as a software raid setup. A hardware raid controller costs money but has no overhead on the server. In this video from the lustre user group 20, alan poston from xyratex presents. What is the performance implication of hardware vs software raid in 2disk raid0raid1 setup. Hardware raid vs os raid solutions experts exchange. Oct 30, 2015 while the intel raid controller blows the software raid out of the water on sequential reads, surprisingly the windows software raid was better in nearly every other respect. Hi, i just bought a maximus v formula and im running it with the i7 3770k. Hardware raid will cost more, but it will also be free of software raid s.
Software raid has the advantage of flexibility software raid can take advantage of cpu software raid can be integrated with other storage software encryption, dedup, etc software raid can easily be updated hardware is vendor supported software raid is less expensive hardware raid is performance isolated, memory isolated. But with budget favoring the software raid, those wanting optimum performance and efficiency of raid will have to go with the hardware raid. As the comments on my recent post apples new kickbutt file system showed, some. In order to better monitor the health and performance of your raid system, you have to rely on the specific software, which can be only provided by the vendor. A software raid can be prone to data corruption, due to the fault of the raid software or driver that is being used. Softwareraid gegen hardwareraid im benchmarkvergleich.
Hardware raid 5e vs 6 vs 10 for home media server hard. Raid is a method of combining multiple disk drives into a single entity in order to improve the overall performance and reliability of your system. If you really must run raid 5 on a windows machine that doesnt perform like shit you have two choices. It is used to improve disk io performance and reliability of your server or workstation. Another limitation of linux software raid is expanding raid groups. Hardware raid vs software raid and data recovery so i have been going back and forth between setups for my home web server and file server. Raid 1e requires min of 3 disk, and raid 10 requires a min of 4 disk. Raid redundant array of independent disks is one of the popular data storage virtualization technology. I would take a look at using windows software raid vs. Ive used windows server 2012 r2 storage spaces for software raid as we are a microsoft shop. As far as fault tolerance goes, ill respectfully disagree. I currently have a boot drive as the ocx vertex 4 512gb, and two seagate 3tb hard drives that id like to set up as mirrored drives raid 1. It is a way to virtualize multiple, independent hard disk drives into one or more arrays to. Raid hardware vs raid software what is your best option.
Raid can be divided into two types, hardware raid and software raid. What is the difference between a software and hardware raid. Do either of them allow you to move the drive to another computer. Additionally, hardwareassisted software raid usually comes with a variety of drivers for the most popular operating systems, and therefore, is more os independent than pure software raid. If that controller has a bbu battery that retains the contents of the cache on power loss then the performance difference will. Do i let the card configure raid 6 or use linux raid. First off, thank you all for your comments whether they were directly for my original questions or a pointer for software vs hardware raid. You have a lowly d525 at your disposal, which is a decent enough little cpu for serving media etc, but its not going to win you any medals performing. Jan 31, 2014 i would take a look at using windows software raid vs. Different raid controller has their different permissions for users. Choosing maplehosting means choosing a hosting provider that is experienced at delivering a perfect hosting. Raid 5 with hot spare disks, raid 1 or 10 should be more tolerant. Dec 21, 2005 for hardware raid, that cpu can be in a disk array or in a raid controller.
Software raid vs hardware raid freebsd mailing lists. In hardware raid it is running on a dedicated processor. Raid 1 vs backup and software raid 1 vs hardware raid 1 h. For raid10 using a smaller block size such as 256kb you get a noticeable difference between hardware and software in rewrite performance. Even if your hardware raid box controller chip was top of the line when you bought it, it can quickly become out of date as chip speeds improve, and you wont be able to swap it out for a new one. That is what the thread was about, mainly, will raid 1 benefit enough to justify the extra risk and investment for a hw controller. For software raid i used the linux kernel software raid functionality of a system running 64bit fedora 9. In software raid it is running on the system processor. With cheaper hardware raid you can also lose data if theres a power outage. Software raid, as you might already know, is usually builtin on your os and unlike a hardware raid, you will need to spend a little extra on a controller card. If you have hardware raid then youll most probably have a hardware controller with hardware cache on it. While you might think the computer you are using is the most important part of your everyday and professional workflows, there is something even more important.
Software raid is a type of raid implementation that utilizes operating systembased capabilities to construct and deliver raid services. Regarding raid1e and 10 the main difference between 1e and 10 is that 1e uses an odd number of disk for providing protection, where as 10 uses an even number of disk. A software raid is free but does carry some overhead on the server and may be less reliable under certain circumstances. Raid is a data storage virtualization technology that combines multiple physical disk drive. You can easily move disks from a failed enclosure to a new one, and all your data is preserved. Real raids for speed and were needed but for movies and home storage software is the best bang for buck imo only. The real differences come down to reliability and performance and what is handling the raid commands.
Ive been hoping other people would post with some experience, because im in the middle of a decision and am leaning toward software but just basically fear the unknown. In a hardware raid setup, the drives connect to a special raid controller inserted in a fast pciexpress pcie slot in a motherboard. The reason i sought a hardware raid solution was due to the fact that for about 8 months i was running mdadm as a software raid 6 solution. What are the advantagesdisadvantages of doing the mirroring using windows vs doing it using the intel rst features. Configuration is still required, but that configuration takes place outside the system. As the comments on my recent post apples new kickbutt file system showed, some folks cant believe that software raid could. But the real question is whether you should use a hardware raid solution or a software raid solution. Difference between hardware raid and software raid. It is a way to virtualize multiple, independent hard disk drives into one or more arrays to improve performance, capacity and reliability. A brief history of raid raid has been around since 1970s 1989 berkeley paper was a taxonomy 1989 witnessed the first raid5 in software 1990s saw many hardware raid3, 5s lsi, 3ware, maxstrat, highpoint, intel 1990s also saw the introduction of raidframe mdraid came along in 2001. Regular raid 1, as provided by linux software raid, does not stripe reads, but.
This is a method of improving the performance and reliability of your storage media by using multiple drives. A software raid can also be affected if the host computer is heavily loaded. A brief history of raid raid has been around since 1970s 1989 berkeley paper was a taxonomy 1989 witnessed the first raid5 in software 1990s saw many hardware raid3, 5s lsi, 3ware, maxstrat, highpoint, intel. Software raid will never become obsolete and will continue to get updated with updated versions of your operating system. Dedicated hardware controller doing the processing vs. One of the first questions we felt needed to be answered was what exactly hardware raid cards do.
As for the hardware vs software raid question, adaptec raid cards are good at what they do. Hardware raid is more expensive than software raid, but offers better performance and interoperability. The only point in using raid, is to handle a drive failure, without causing downtime. This means using dedicated hardware to control the array, as opposed to.
Imho, im a big fan of kernel developers non directly related to zfs, so i really prefere mdadm to hardware raid. I would generally agree with a preference for hardware vs. Raid stands for redundant array of inexpensive disks. What is the performance implication of hardware vs. Windows raid vs intel rst vs raidz vs hardware raid. Software raid does its processing on the server motherboard. Software raid comparison made at the beginning of this article. The more hard drives means more cpu cycle will go to software raid instead of your apache postfix or mysql server. Nov 16, 2007 another limitation of linux software raid is expanding raid groups. For hardware raid, that cpu can be in a disk array or in a raid controller. Jul 07, 2009 a redundant array of inexpensive disks raid allows high levels of storage reliability. Software raid 1 using windows or hardware raid 1 using a raid controller. Ive been hoping other people would post with some experience, because im in the middle of a decision and am leaning toward software but. The drives are configured, so that the data is either divided between disks to distribute load, or duplicated to ensure that it can be recovered once a disk fails.
Jul 06, 2011 reasons for using software raid versus a hardware raid setup. Windows software raid vs hardware raid ars technica. Jun, 2012 generally speaking, software, fake, and hardware raid all support your normal raid tasks, such as keeping a raid in sync, rebuilding after a drive fails, checking drive health, etc. Raid 5 vs raid 10 performance and other raid levels. Where that processing occurs can be important depending on the complexity of your raid setup. It is generally fine, however, to use windows software raid on simple storage.
Reasons for using software raid versus a hardware raid setup. We list the pros and cons of hardware vs software raid to help you decide which one is best for you. With software raid your data can be split across different enclosures for complete redundancy one can completely stop working and your data is still ok. I personally avoid marvell integrated raid like the plague due to extremely poor performance worse by far than windows raid, but some of their actual hardware solutions are alright. Honestly, if your server has sufficient cpu, your network is still the bottleneck. Hardware raid and implications for the future youtube. It seems that no matter if you use a hardware or a software raid controller, you should expect to lose performance when youre duplicating every write, which makes sense. If you can handle your system being down, for a drive replacement, and worst case, a reinstall, then you dont need raid. Hardware raid works under raid controller, but software raid is called dynamic disk and works under windows.
If anything they should be advised to increase ram and be done with it. Explanation about raid, hardware raid and software raid. It just has a boot helper to go along with it in the bios. A hp server that i work on had two disks in a raid1 array, one of my colleagues added an extra disk and made it a raid5, the hardware raid device moved the data around as appropriate while the machine was running and the disk space was expanded without any downtime. A raid can be deployed using both software and hardware. Software raid means that the raid is handled by the general purpose os and hardware raid means that the raid is handled by a special purpose satasas controller card that runs its own os, cpu, memory, etc. I do agree though, that hardware raid is the best choice. Hardware raid vs software raid windows 7 help forums. Moved to a raid 5 then went for unraid, not selling unraid but for home users not after write speed and some what read its perfect for nas use and now offers daul redundancy drives so raid 1 on redundancy. Hardware beats out software substantially in output for parity raid, with hardware being 66% faster for block output and 20% faster for rewrite performance in a 256kb chunk raid6.
So could i do a software raid 5 of 18 tb total 3x 6 tb. Before raid was raid, software disk mirroring raid 1 was a huge profit generator for system vendors, who sold it as an addon to their. A redundant array of inexpensive disks raid allows high levels of storage reliability. Hardware raid 5e vs 6 vs 10 for home media server hardforum. Hardware raid has the ability to take a group of drives and make it appear as a single drive. My experience with hardware and fake hardware raid is that as long as you stay with the same vendor, the raid metadata will be recognized ive seen this when moving drives between various hp, areca and lsi hardware raid controllers, and with intel, amd and even via hostraid i was pretty surprised when i connected a 250gb hard drive from some old amd desktop box to a hp g1 microserver, and. However this also fundamentally precludes integration of features into the os and file system. Hardware raid offers better reliability compared to software raid. A hp server that i work on had two disks in a raid 1 array, one of my colleagues added an extra disk and made it a raid 5, the hardware raid device moved the data around as appropriate while the machine was running and the disk space was expanded without any downtime. Heavy processing can cause some pieces of data to be delayed by a small amount of time. Hardware raid presents logical disks that are already configured to the system or the san, mirrored and ready to go. Additionally, hardware assisted software raid usually comes with a variety of drivers for the most popular operating systems, and therefore, is more os independent than pure software raid. Soft possibly the longest running battle in raid circles is which is faster, hardware raid or software raid. I used to have 2x 160gb hard drives in software raid 1 and a single 500gb hard drive for storage.
For instance, the highend disk controllers can be very costly. Comparing hardware raid vs software raid deals with how the storage drives in a raid array connect to the motherboard, and the. The w7 software raid doesnt seem to notify the user when a disk fails. Under software raid, that configuration is performed in the.
Hardware redundant array of inexpensive disks raid and software raid are two main ways for setting up raid system. In this post, ill share my results comparing hardware to software raid on modern windows 10, then to take things up a notch, ill see how a storage spaces volume with parity maybe microsoft is charged money for using the word raid, because they avoid that word like the plague. Comparing hardware raid vs software raid setups deals with how the storage drives in a raid array connect to the motherboard in a server or pc, and the management of those drives. This integration is really what has allowed software raid to dramatically outpace hardware raid. Hardware raid is far more expensive than software raid. Ive ordered an areca 1280ml 24 port sata controller. Im about to start a new server build for home media storage. All you need to do is connect the drives and configure the raid level you want. Benefits and drawbacks of hybrid, hardware assisted software raid. Whether software raid vs hardware raid is the one for you depends on what you need to do and. Today, raid is found everywherefrom operating system software features to standalone controllers providing advanced data integrity in highend storage area.
139 538 768 1306 590 1345 1635 83 1663 1338 1155 18 984 724 1308 735 947 1481 1431 388 513 779 978 920 1373 1690 1375 787 1103 731 324 184 1540 819 855 1289 273 214 967 29 1398 443 394